The number of serious accidents on 20mph roads increased by around a quarter (26%) last year, according to analysis of Government data by the Institute of Advanced Motorists.
Slight accidents on 20mph roads increased by 17%.
Casualties in 20mph zones also saw a rise. Serious casualties increased by 29% while slight casualties went up by 19%.
However, there was a decrease in the number of serious and slight accidents on 30mph and 40 mph roads.
Serious accidents went down 9% on 30mph roads and 7% on 40 mph roads.
There was a 5% reduction in slight accidents on 30 mph roads and a 3% decrease on 40 mph roads.
IAM chief executive Simon Best said: “The Government and councils need to take stock on the effectiveness of 20mph signs.
"Recent advice, guidance and relaxation of regulations has all been about making it easier for councils to put 20mph limits in place.
“More and more roads are being given a 20mph limit but they do not seem to be delivering fewer casualties.
"The IAM are concerned that this is because simply putting a sign on a road that still looks like a 30mph zone does not change driver behaviour.
"More evaluation and research is needed into the real world performance of 20mph limits to ensure limited funds are being well spent.
"In locations with a proven accident problem, authorities need to spend more on changing the character of our roads so that 20mph is obvious, self-enforcing and above all contributes to fewer injuries.
"In Europe, it is long-term investment in high quality segregated or shared surfaces that have led to a much safer environment for cyclists and pedestrians.”
Andy Neale - 04/07/2014 13:47
I think Simon may have answered his own question; "More and more roads are being given a 20mph limit but they do not seem to be delivering fewer casualties" More 20mph roads means there are bound to be more accidents on these and its probably no coincidence that accidents on 30mph and 40mph roads have decreased; that'll be because these roads are now subject to the 20mph speed limit, follow!