Derby City Council favours scrappage scheme over CAZ charge, third air quality debate reveals

Derby City Council is in no rush to jump on the 'CAZ charging bandwagon' and will instead try alternative methods to meet air quality obligations, Stephen Briers reports. 

The third air quality debate hosted by the British Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association (BVRLA), ACFO, Energy Saving Trust and Fleet News heard a new interpretation of the Government framework for clean air zones. 

However, despite the inconsistency it creates with the approach taken by other cities, fleets warmly welcomed this particular deviation.

Derby City Council revealed to delegates that it has no plans to “voluntarily” charge for any vehicles entering the city centre.

Unlike Leeds, which wants to introduce a wide charging zone for Class B vehicles (trucks, buses and taxis), and Nottingham, which is mirroring the Class B proposal over a more compact clean air zone (CAZ), Derby councillors are confident they can meet their air quality obligations through alternative measures, including a proposed scrappage scheme for the most polluting vehicles.

One of the reasons for this view is their belief that the cost of regularly paying the CAZ charge may be prohibitive for those who cannot afford to upgrade their vehicle to a compliant Euro 6 diesel, Euro 4 petrol or electric/hybrid, either through retrofit or buying a new vehicle. For company employees, the CAZ charge will simply be reclaimed on expenses and might actually be less costly than changing the vehicle.

“We don’t think it’s necessarily a directly effective measure,” said Nigel Brien, head of traffic and transportation at the council. 

“It’s blunt tool that could have unintended consequences.”

READ MORE: Bristol City Council outlines clean air zone options

Nevertheless, councillor Asaf Afzal, cabinet member for neighbourhoods and public protection, acknowledged the concerns about air pollution and said it was something the council was taking very seriously.

But, he stated: “Charging is not a compulsory part of clean air zones, so a charging scheme will not be voluntarily introduced in this city. We can achieve specific levels through a range of other measures, such as public transport and cleaner vehicles.”

However, this decision appeared to be under threat after the Government lost a third case over illegal air pollution to environmental activists ClientEarth in late February. 

The Government will now be required by law to draw up new plans after the High Court upheld ClientEarth’s claims that the current policy was inadequate.

READ MORE: High Court orders Government to tackle air pollution outside clean air zones

ClientEarth believes that charging CAZs should be mandatory. However, the High Court did say that the action taken for the five cities required to tackle air pollution, which includes Derby, was “sensible, rational and lawful”.

That seems to give Derby City Council the green light to continue pursuing its alternative measures, such as investing £2.5 million from the clean bus technology fund to retrofit 150 buses, which will reduce tailpipe emissions “by up to 90%”.

It also plans to install more electric vehicle charging points and promote a healthier lifestyle through sport and cycling.

Councillors recently met environment minister Therese Coffey to seek support for a scrappage scheme. 

Afzal said he was committed to working with partners, businesses and everyone with a stake in the future of the city. “It is good to understand what big business is facing so we can deal with it collectively,” he added.

Derby City Council estimates it would cost £5m in public money to establish a charging zone in the inner city, but the Defra modelling on air quality suggests the city could be compliant by 2022/23 regardless of any action.

It has isolated issues on ring roads, with the worst at 43 microgrammes (based on its own measurements) – just above the 40 microgrammes limit. These problems will be resolved through targeted road schemes.

Fleets praised the council’s decision. One said: “It is refreshing that you are looking at other options first rather than just ticking the charging box.”

One challenge will be to change culture and habits so people are less inclined to drive short distances. Derby is investing in CCTV and lighting to improve safety for walkers, and is considering hire schemes for electric bicycles plus improved cycle routes.

However, it also pointed to the importance in educating schoolchildren as to the benefits of walking and cycling. 

And it recognised that it needs to take action to tackle the grey fleet issue. “We have a car club in Derby which gives people a way to change their habits,” said one councillor.

There was universal agreement that Government needs to amend planning laws for new housing estates to encourage installation of EV charging points. Derby wants greater powers to mandate new charging points.

Lorna McAtear, head of supply and internal accounts at Royal Mail, underlined one of the issues for companies that lease their premises: “We have already put six electric vans in Derby. Our wider challenge is planning for charging points when you are not the landlord.”

Read the recent air quality debates: 

• Leeds City Council 
• Nottingham City Council 

Fleets and leasing companies raised concerns about nervousness in the used market over electric vehicles due to a lack of consumer understanding. 

Feedback suggested the market was polarised, with much greater demand over the past 12 months for premium brand EVs, but far less interest in volume marques.

However, there is also an issue over new car supply for those willing to make the investment. In addition, there are few vans on the market with a range of more than 100 miles, although some are being trialled in Europe. 

Greater pressure and support needs to be put on manufacturers to provide better, commercially feasible vans and HGVs that can work for fleet operators.

One fleet said: “We are two years away from the major manufacturers producing electric HGVs with any decent payload and range.”

On the subject of cars, another added: “The Government is not helping because we don’t know the BIK tax after 2020 or the impact of the WLTP (Worldwide harmonised Light vehicle Test Procedure) tests on BIK. The lack of information puts people off.”

The WLTP, which measures real-world driving emissions, will be published on all vehicles from September. 

However, WLTP only provides emissions measurements on the vehicle as sold – more information is required for modified vehicles, such as those towing a trailer. Delegates also question the emissions from refrigeration units, which are run off separate systems. 

They urged the council to push the Government for further details.

Derby City Council will need to make a robust case to justify its decision not to introduce a charging zone, particularly in view of the latest High Court ruling. However, it is yet to formalise its proposals, which have to be presented to Government by the end of March. 

Delegates felt councillors needed to act fast in order to meet the deadline.

Policy proposals from the fleet sector

• Since one of the biggest contributors to poor air quality is congestion, Derby City Council should encourage fleets to make collections and deliveries outside times of heavy traffic, particularly at night. This proved successful in London during the 2012 Olympics.
• Vehicles sold at the end of a rental or lease period are typically far cleaner than the average counterparts on UK roads. A scheme could be developed that would enable BVRLA members to sell vehicles directly to local businesses in Derby via a council-developed and operated website, thereby moving on the greenest vehicles. 
• Provide Mobility Credits, redeemable on public transport, rental, car clubs, or other forms of greener travel, to drivers giving up older, more polluting diesel vehicles. Funding can be provided by the Government’s Clean Air Fund, if Derby City Council can support a case.

Nigel Brien, Derby City Council

Derby City Council believes meeting its air quality targets can be achieved by changing travel behaviour, changing fleets and exploring innovation.

“We need all sectors to be engaged and fleet is a critical element,” said head of traffic and transportation Nigel Brien.

“There are two levels – volume and make-up of the fleet. So we need to reduce travel or change to a more sustainable form, or change the vehicles being used to cleaner, low emission ones.”

The council is basing its proposals on a number of projects.

1. Investment of £1.5 million in cleaner journeys, with measures including cycle infrastructure.
2. Investment of £400,000 in a ‘try before you buy’ scheme to allow local businesses to trial electric vans and also smaller-sized trucks which may be more suitable for their needs. The council will buy the vehicles and lend them to operators via a booking process. 
3. Investment of £800,000 in new EV charging points for taxis while simultaneously promoting the benefits of EVs in terms of fuel savings and lower maintenance costs.
4. More EV charging points for the public.
5. Fleet reviews, particularly for SMEs.
6. Development of a small load consolidation project, such as night-time deliveries or a focus on removing empty-load journeys.

“We continue to lobby Government that this is happening in the real world – we don’t want businesses to be disadvantaged,” Brien said. “But it’s an exciting time; there are opportunities for innovation and new businesses.”