The two main fleet trade bodies are calling for clarification in the Budget on long-term company car tax rates and measures to make plug-in vehicles more attractive to fleets.
ACFO and the BVRLA have urged the Chancellor to use the Budget on Wednesday, March 19, to encourage the take-up of ultra-low emission vehicles (ULEVs).
Both organisations want the Government to ditch its plan to increase the benefit-in-kind (BIK) tax rate on electric vehicles from zero to 5% in 2015/16.
BVRLA chief executive Gerry Keaney said: “The Budget is the perfect opportunity for the Government to prove it is committed to driving the take-up of ULEVs.”
Currently, drivers who choose a plug-in vehicle with zero emissions do not pay any BIK tax, but they will face a tax bill for the first time next year.
ACFO and the BVRLA both believe that will damage demand. ACFO director Phil Redman called on fellow fleet decision-makers to lobby their local MPs about the BIK tax rise.
He told around 100 delegates at ACFO’s Electric Vehicle Seminar that the association has put pressure on the Government and “we want fleet managers to do so as well”.
He added: “The tax rises should not be coming in before 2020 to enable electric vehicles to become established.”
With electric company cars on a four-, five- or six-year operating cycle, Redman says employees also need to know the tax position well into the future.
Nevertheless, at IBM, where Redman manages a 4,000-strong company car fleet and 5,500 cash allowance drivers, five employees have selected EVs with orders placed for a further seven, including six BMW i3s.
Anna West, head of consumer initiatives at the Office for Low Emission Vehicles, said the Government was committed to maintaining a two percentage point differential between the 0-50g/km and 51-75g/km BIK tax band in 2015/16 and beyond, but that the Treasury “was unable to maintain” the 0% rate on zero emission models.
Company car tax rates will increase from April 6 and have been announced for the following two tax years, 2015/16 and 2016/17, but are unknown from 2017/18 onwards.
ACFO is calling on the Chancellor to clarify the rates for 2017/18, so that fleets will again have a four-year cycle of advance notification of thresholds.
Both it and the BVRLA also want the Chancellor to announce that BIK should be calculated according to the price of the model minus the £5,000 plug-in car grant.
ACFO director and former chairman Julie Jenner, who recently met HM Revenue and Customs officials, added: “ACFO also remains concerned that HMRC has still not issued any clear guidance on mileage reimbursement rates relating to electric vehicles whether as a company car or a privately-owned vehicle driven on company business.”
EV mileage reimbursement rates for company cars (Advisory Fuel Rates) and privately-owned cars on business trips (Approved Mileage Allowance Payments) remain to be clarified, despite repeated ACFO requests.
Jenner said: “Without clarification it is, we believe, another issue that holds back fleets from potentially utilising electric vehicles.”
However, West said that OLEV was working with HMRC to try and develop a new regime and “guidance will be published soon”.
Patriot - 11/03/2014 21:19
Another subsidy for EV's? Why? Just love this segment: 'want the Chancellor to announce that BIK should be calculated according to the price of the model minus the £5,000 plug-in car grant'. OK, if HM Treasury agree to this then the precedent will be set for companies to calculate BiK on fossil fuelled vehicles at MRP less the massive discounts they get from the manufacturers. Failure by HM Treasury to consider this would be in breach of Article 14 ECHR. Either everyone is treated equally or they are not. The Hug-a-Polar-Bear brigade cannot claim any exemptions that discriminates against the majority. Note to ACFO and the BVRLA: Consult Legal Eagles Before Making Daft Statements.