Drinks wholesaler Matthew Clark has moved the funding and management of its fleet to Zenith, from a previous cash allowance only arrangement.
The new car scheme is being provided to 160 business need drivers.
One of the key aims of moving from a cash allowance to a company car scheme was to provide an improved choice for employees and minimise the impact and responsibility of running their own car.
Matthew Clark was keen to deliver a car scheme that was competitive within the marketplace, to help recruit and retain the best employees.
An attractive car list has been devised and drivers now have a choice from a number of premium brands.
Other important issues addressed by the change included duty of care and safety. Moving business need drivers from a ‘grey fleet’ to company cars means that they can be provided with new, fully maintained vehicles, assisting with duty of care obligations and ensuring the safety of business drivers.
Emissions have been capped at 120g/km CO2 due to Matthew Clark’s desire to deliver an environmentally sustainable fleet policy.
Dan Haddon, purchasing controller for Matthew Clark, said: “We chose Zenith as our fleet and funding partner after assessing four providers. Zenith was selected due to its high quality customer service offering, which was clearly evident both throughout the tender process and through a visit to its office. Zenith shares a similar ethos through its customer-centric focus and passion for what it does. Its Pulse online fleet reporting systems and driver websites also stood out.”
Bob the Engineer - 04/07/2014 08:24
I feel sorry for the poor employees. Better choice? how can you have better choice with a CO2 cap? the duty of care excuse can be taken care of by applying a good driver policy, its not neccesary to opt out of cash allowance. The drivers will be shocked how much a decent vehicle costs as company car tax is outrageous for anything even at 120 grams. Also they will be paying for the lease companies costs and profits instead of taking advantage of the used car market. My company did the same and my current vehicle will cost me 2.5 times more, I am having to drastically downsize and downmarket and still it costs me more. I have had to downgrade to the point it is detrimental to my ability to do my job, but hey! the the rain forest is saved right? (wrong time, wrong direction to go this way, but then the people making these decisions don't have to plod 40K a year in a cheap small underpowered car do they?)